The effect of money in elections

The effect of money in elections Historically, we have had a two party system with minor parties. In todays society Americas two party systems affects the elections and decision of voters as an American Political Landscape. Both parties progresses the ability to mark their political public services to individual voters based on computer models they established from historic patterns and large sample- sized polls that push approaches towards the issues and the candidates, called data mining. Theres either a view point with the Democratic Party on the Right of the table, and on the left of the table there is the Republican Party that has a totally different observation about the topic of discussion. These will be the only TWO options you can vote on or either vote for. The Democratic and Republican national parties and most state parties are moderate in their policies and leadership. In recent years both parties have strengthen the role of the national committee and enhanced the inference of individual committee members. Over time, although the citizens have the right to elect and vote, our Democracy party has combined between the direct democracy and representative democracy. Having a direct democracy is allowing the people to vote who should run as nominees in the office. In representative democracy this is allowing the people to elect those who govern to pass laws; also known as the, Republic. The rules to the political voting and elections game have changed and expanded to the citizens, these rules in America affects how it is to be played. Two words, Thriving Media, according to the text also in, Government by the People, (p. 212) is the surrounding function of our elections and voters in todays society. The media, in particular the print media, have been called the fourth estate and the fourth branch of government. Seventy percent of the public think that the media and internet sources are watch dogs, here to inform us about any such moves during an election. Everyone wants a say-so, and to point fingers at who to vote for the best candidate, of the two. Platforms are ambiguous by design, giving voters few obvious reasons to vote against the party. The American two part system has the effect of using both systems against one another, who knows if each nominee will practice what they preach, once being voted into the office. As read above yes we do have a two part system, but it seems like the two maybe combining together and causing our voters and elections to bring across confusion. There are many internet resources we could use (Watch- Dogs) but in what favor are those resources really? The political game is just that a game used to get that, Winner-Takes-All peaking point. The American two part system affects our elections and voter choices by perception. I even feel as if everyone is not getting to express themselves with exactly what they need from our government. Having a two part system does not let the United States explore enough or as many choices as having a muliti- system. Money,- Although the parties cannot exert tight control over candidates, their ability to raise and spend money has had a significant influence. This time in life money plays a major role on anything, so with the elections and votes it has full control over America. Studies have shown on the Google, website, that the Republican Party spends six times as much money on their campaigns than the Democrat party. Thanks to, Citizens vs. F.E.C. getting the law passed that as much money can be given or fundraised to a campaign in any amount. This allows all sorts of sponsors, interest groups, corporate fronts, and lobbyist to step their foot into the campaign world. Defend Democracy, this statement was used to fight the battle that Corporations should be given an equal opportunity as citizens of the United States of America. In other, words opening the door so that all candidates should be able to spend as much money as conceivable to their campaign. As declared in 1976 and 1978, America has money defined as, Soft Money- money raised in unlimited amounts by political parties for party-building purposes. Now largely illegal except for limited contributions to state or local parties for voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts. also according to our text in Government by the People, (p. 197). America also has, Hard- Money- Political contributions given to a party, candidate, or interest group that are limited in amount and fully disclosed. Raising such limited funds is harder than raising unlimited funds, hence the term hard money. All national party committees combined raised more than $509 MILLION of soft money in the 1999- 2000 election cycles, up from 110 MILLION adjusted for inflation in 1991- 1992. Banning soft money became the primary objective of reformers and was one of the more important provisions in the BRCA. Soft money enabled large donors to be major players in campaign finance. In the 2008 election the Obama campaign used advertisements such as the Internet to coordinate, communicate, and recruit volunteers (interest groups). I could say that it does give a freedom of speech, but to whom, the nominee or the voters? Advertisement is used worldwide to persuade the people into buying the product. Political advertisement is very manipulation able. In this situation the product thats trying to be sold is the vote. The United States uses political advertisement as an enhancement to vote for whoever the best candidate seems to favor at that time in the public eye. There may be some proof that the media may influence our culture in America by a great deal. America has the television, the newspapers, Internet, and the radio for advertisement sources. The television gives us an image that print media such as the newspaper cannot. We get to experience and create a picture of what things are going on in the political world. Newspapers are still being read, as I still do read them but not necessarily for politics, I usually do watch the television to keep up with elections for visuals. Another stronger advertisement in politics and in anything today is the Internet. The drastic increase in usage of the web also can give visuals and a lot of information on the candidates up for running. The news media have changed dramatically throughout the course of U.S. history. By calling the publics attention to certain issues, the media help determine what topics will become subjects of public debate and legislation. In a way the advertisement of the elections is to throw out an attention grabber, then lower the audience in to pick them as a nominee. Advertisement is very persuasive in running elections. This subject can also put us back at the money being used for the elections. The more money a campaign has the more information and broadcasting they can attend to get to voters. Cool slogans catch the peoples interests, especially a younger crowd that rarely pays close thoughtfulness to anything in politics. There are a lot of commercials and post boards blinding us about different candidates proposal. No one would ever get to see the competitors argument if they could not raise enough money to broadcast as much. According to different internet anonymous sources all over the internet, theres an impression that corporation helping maintain certain nominees up for the office stand to be pretty scandalous. On that note I leave this paper with the finding of huge information and knowledge I didnt know or had even considered with my own government. Happening in the United States of America, is the American two- party system, money issues, and advertisement usage and the effects on elections and the voter system today.

Relations Between the Soviet Union and China Hostile Essay

What were the turning-point events that kept relations between the Soviet Union and China hostile for over 20 years? There were many disputes between China and Russia between the 1950s and 1960s. The disputes may be caused by ideological differences, self-interest, personalities of the leaders, or domestic problems. Mao and Stalin had ideological differences. Although Mao and Stalin’s ideologies are based on Marxism, Stalin believed Mao using the peasants as the basis for revolution is not the right interpretation of Marxism. Stalin thought workers in cities should be the basis to lead the revolution. Also, Stalin feared Mao compete against him in the Communist world, so Stalin wanted a weak China and the USSR will then dominate Asia. He made his policies through self-interests. Thus, Stalin wanted Mao to cooperate with Chiang Kai-shek instead of carrying out a revolution. Therefore Mao believed Stalin was not a true revolutionary. The Sino-Soviet Treaty Alliance is another example, which the Soviets acted through self-interest. The treaty, which was the first treaty between China and Russia, offered the Chinese Soviet expertise and low interest aid. However, it was signed after two months of negotiation and the Chinese was received poor treatment. Plus, the Chinese would have to repay Soviets’ aid with interests. Moreover, the Chinese traditional buildings were replaced with Soviet style buildings and Socialist sciences were prioritized over the western, which was far more effective than the Socialist sciences. Mao was not happy about Stalin’s actions in the Korean War. Stalin encouraged China to send troops into Korea. China sent one million soldiers to Korea and Russia gave China material assistance but China paid $1.35 billion for the Soviet equipment. Between 1953 and 1956, there were tensions and suspicions in Mao and Stalin’s relationship. Stalin might have purposely delay the end of the Korean War in order to weaken China. After Stalin’s death, tension between Russia and China has relaxed. Soviet leaders tried to make the treaties fairer for China. During the leadership years of Khrushchev, tension has eased between China and the USSR. However, tension rose again at the conference of Communist Parties. Mao called Russia to abandon revisionism, which supports Western Capitalists. Mao also believed the USSR is trying to isolate China. Deng believed capitalism had to be crushed in violent revolution. Khrushchev’s visit to Beijing in order to ease the tension caused by the conference was unsuccessful. Khrushchev’s hotel, which was infested by mosquitos, had no A/C in the summer. Also, Khrushchev who was bad at swimming was invited to swim with Mao. It was humiliating for Khrushchev because he had to wear tight swimming shorts and a swim ring. Meanwhile, Deng used this opportunity to criticize the Sovi ets. He said the Soviets had betrayed the Communist movement and had sent spies disguised as technical advisers to China. Next, a series of events caused China and Russia’s relation to deteriorate. The Taiwan crisis resulted the Soviets withdrawing their economic advisers and cancelled commercial contracts with China. Then the Soviets denounced the faulty design of The Great Leap Forward, which made Mao infuriated. Therefore, Mao would now aid any communist countries that do not agree with the USSR. An example of this would be China aiding Albania. In 1961, the USSR withdrew aid from Albania. Then China replaced the Soviet aid to Albania. This led to more hostilities between the two communist countries. Khrushchev and Mao also had different views on nuclear weapons. Mao did not fear nuclear war because he believed war is unavoidable in the revolutionary struggle. On the other hand, Khrushchev want wanted to co-exist with the US. The Test-ban Treaty was signed in 1963, in which the USSR and US agreed to stop nuclear tests. Mao saw this as the USSR siding with the imperialist powers. Also, China called the USSR for help on the development of nuclear weapons, but the Soviets rejected. After Khrushchev left office in 1964, the Soviets continued isolating China. The Soviets criticized the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Also the Soviets used this opportunity to criticize China on its development of worldwide opium trade, receiving assistance from West Germany on nuclear research, and so on. China and Russia also had disputes on border. In 1969, they started fighting because of border disputes and Mao was prepared for nuclear war. In the end nuclear weapons was not used, but the dispute had threatened to turn into a full-scale war. The Vietnam War had also caused the disputes between China and Russia because they all wanted Vietnam to be influenced by their ideologies. In the end, USSR won and the Soviet-Vietnamese Treaty of Peace and Friendship was formed. In conclusion, mainly because of self-interest and different ideological views, Russia and China had conflicts on the Conference of Communist Parties in 1957, Taiwan, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, the Vietnam War, and border issues. Because of these serious of events, China and Russia relations were hostile over 20 years.

Modern Day Juvenile Justice System - 882 Words

The modern day Juvenile Justice System (JJS) in the U.S. evolved out of fragmented reform movements throughout the country that began in 1800 and continued into the 1900’s, Progressive Era. Out of the many movements that were occurring in various states, two pioneered approaches took place that could easily be considered the roots of the entire JJS. In 1824 in the state of New York, the New York House of Refuge became the nation’s first reformatory for children. For the first time, there was an alternative to placing young offenders within jails and it did not take long for other states to create their own versions to address growing concerns about incarcerated youth (Einstein Law, 2015). Next, Illinois in 1899 changed the way young offenders interacted with the court with the creation of the nation’s first juvenile court. For the first time the focus shifted from that of criminalization and punishment, to one of social support that provided guidance, care, and kept young offenders from almshouses and penitentiaries. In addition, the Illinois Juvenile Court removed the stigma of labels and afforded protections to the young by creating closed proceedings and using terminology such as petitions of delinquency, dispositions and adjunctions instead of criminal charges, sentences and trials to (Long, 1999). Once the idea of a formalized JJS took hold in the country very little changed until the U.S. Supreme court and Federal Government pass laws that regulated the entireShow MoreRelatedBad Kids Race And The Transformation Of Juvenile Court1649 Words   |  7 PagesIn Bad Kids Race and the Transformation of Juvenile Court, Barry Feld provides a history as well as possible solutions to the problems that currently have a grapple hold on our juvenile justice system. Barry Feld is one of the nations most respected scholars of juvenile justice and currently teaches the subject, amongst other things, at the University of Minnesota. Feld himself graduated from law school at the University of Minnesota and later received his Ph.D. in sociology from Harvard. This book’sRead MoreThe Juvenile Justice System Essay examples1326 Words   |  6 PagesThe Juvenile Justice System Jodia M Murphy Kaplan University CJ150 Juvenile Delinquency Professor Thomas Woods July 31, 2012 Abstract This paper takes a brief look at the history and evolution of the juvenile justice system in the United States. In recent years there has been an increase of juvenile cases being transferred into the adult court system. This paper will also look at that process and the consequences of that trend. History and Evolution In the early nineteenth centuryRead MoreThe 19th Century : The Nineteenth Century1333 Words   |  6 Pagesactually still going on in places like Louisiana. Youth of that day had probably taken part in the war in one form or another which caused them to mature at a faster rate. This, coupled with an agrarian society and different social norms, had children as young as fifteen married and having children of their own (Hacker D. J., 2003). The age distinction we place on juveniles today would not have been applied at that time, subsequently juveniles who broke the law were tried in the same courts as adults.Read More Juvenile Detention Makes Teens Worse Essay1742 Words   |  7 Pagesthe juvenile justice system, and while most of their denunciations remain the same as those of the justice system at large, an ample portion of their criticisms revolve around the claim that incarcerating young people not only doesn’t work in deterring or rehabilitating them, but makes them worse and leads to adult misconduct. A report noted that youth sent to juvenile prison were 37 times more likely to be arrested as adults (Szalavitz, 2009). Another major problem some cite with the juvenile justiceRead MoreJuvenile Delinquency : Should Severity Of Punishment For Young Offenders Be The Same As Adults?1200 Words   |  5 PagesJuvenile Delinquency: Should Severity of Punishment for Young Offenders Be the Same as Adults? Throughout centuries of development, crime and social safety are still the biggest concerns for a country since it can influence the political, economic, and social aspects. With the evolution of human civilization, more than seventy percent of the world has been urbanized into developed countries. These countries contain advanced technologies, highly-comprehensive policies and economic system. Along withRead MoreThe Main Aim Of Eradicating Criminal From The Society1439 Words   |  6 PagesJuvenile Crimes The main aim of eradicating criminal from the society is to enhance peaceful coexistence among people and to aid development. In this regard, individuals who fail to fit in this setting should be eradicated regardless of their age and made responsible for their actions. Releasing murderers, rapists, and other criminals from jail after serving a lenient and short sentence does not rehabilitate them in any way. In this regard, all those who are engaged in criminal activities that riskRead MoreJuvenile Delinquency Essay examples1216 Words   |  5 PagesJuvenile Delinquency I. The harsh beginnings. Children were viewed as non-persons until the 1700s. They did not receive special treatment or recognition. Discipline then is what we now call abuse. There were some major assumptions about life before the 1700s. The first assumption is that life was hard, and you had to be hard to survive. The people of that time in history did not have the conveniences that we take for granted. For example, the medical practices of that day were primitive inRead MoreNot Yet an Adult in the Juvenile Justice System Essay700 Words   |  3 PagesPeople should not treat teenagers as kids. Teenagers should know that committing a crime is wrong. The Justice Department says that about 10 percent of all homicides are committed by juveniles and almost every year, the FBI arrests more than 33,000 young adults for offenses. Crime is a crime and being a teenager is not an excuse from being punished by law like an adult. The juvenile justice system is influenced by neuroscience saying that teenagers brain are still developing. The study says teenager’sRead MoreMassachusetts s Juvenile Justice System1737 Words   |  7 PagesConnecticut’s juvenile justice system was designed to be non-criminal and rehabilitative. In Connecticut anyone under the age of 16 is considered a child and anyone who is at least 16 or almost 18 are considered a youth. They now serve crimes that were done before the alleged suspect turn(s) sixteen. The Connecticut Juvenile Justice System represents both delinquency petitions and Family with Service Needs (FWSN) petitions. The police will send cases to the Superior Court for juvenile Matters, butRead MoreMy Own Interpretation Of Relational Modernity904 Words   |  4 PagesSimon defines relational modernity as being, â€Å"offered to describe expectations for modern-day relationships† (11). From his description, I then formulated my own interpretation of r elational modernity. In the criminal justice system, a lot of studies have shown significant relationships between criminal behavior and the way in which one was raised during childhood. In terms of general morals, a lot of who a person turns out to be in adulthood, is due to their childhood and the way in which they were

The Ethical Dilemma Of Euthanasia - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1339 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/04/29 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Ethical Dilemma Essay Euthanasia Essay Did you like this example? The debate of whether or not euthanasia is an ethical issue has been argued for multiple decades. In the modern day, there are multiple factors of euthanasia and different types. Two of the most debated types of euthanasia are involuntary and voluntary euthanasia. According to the Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine (Second Edition), involuntary euthanasia is when an unconscious patients family member chooses to withdraw medication or surgery that can save their family members life whereas voluntary euthanasia is when one chooses to the path of medical assisted suicide. Involuntary euthanasia is unethical because the patient doesnt choose their fate and the patients natural rights are being disregarded. Voluntary euthanasia is unethical because the patient is committing suicide and it turns doctors into murderers. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Ethical Dilemma Of Euthanasia" essay for you Create order In the occurrence of involuntary euthanasia, the patient is typically at their death bed, whether it be from a fatal accident or disease, and is normally not able to respond and communicate their wishes. When involuntary euthanasia takes place, the patients life is being gambled with. The persons life is being treated as if it were merely nothing. Doctors are disregarding the life of a human being. Brocklehursts Textbook Of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (Seventh Edition) even goes as far as comparing the act of involuntary euthanasia to the murders committed by the Nazis stating that it is,and indication of how disregard for human life can contribute to greater atrocities. This may also affect the way society values a human life as well as make the views on murder seem acceptable. Not valuing the life of a human being by killing them without their consent is an unjustified and immoral resolution. Some might argue that no one has to power to choose when they die. However, your fate lies in the hands of one person, God. Therefore, having members of your family choose whether you live or die is not fair. The person receiving euthanization physically can not voice their opinion of whether their life should continue or end. Their thoughts and choices are not represented and it cannot be called moral if someone dies without choosing. It is called murder. One could compare this act to the euthanization of a family pet or animal. Therefore, one would be treating a human being as an animal, which is unethical in its own way. A human being holds more value than an animal because it lives with a purpose. This act is stripping away the natural rights in which the patient, a human being, are born with. Humans are persons and have moral responsibility. They have personhood and certain rights. All people deserve their natural rights, which includes life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. None of these can be achieved if the involuntary euthanization occurs. In the terms of voluntary euthanasia, it may also be seen as immoral and unethical From a religious standpoint, voluntary euthanasia is seen as suicide. The New Testament of the Christian Bible states, Do you not know that you are Gods temple and that God ?s Spirit dwells in you? If anyone destroys Gods temple, God will destroy him. For Gods Temple is holy, and you are that temple. Choosing when you are going to die can be seen as an act against God himself. As previously stated, the fate of ones life rests in the hands of the Lord. It is also stated in the Bible in Exodus 20:13 that, You shall not murder.Therefore,, asking a doctor to euthanize you is considered ending the life of a person, whether it be you or someone else, can be considered murder. Morals play an important role in many different religions and cultures. One might argue that if euthanization harms no one else, then it should be okay to partake in the act. However, this is not the case. Voluntary euthanization teaches that it is okay to harm yourself and end your life. It can ruin society by teaching younger generations that suicide can be a normal part of someones life. Other people who may be effected are the family members of the patient. They receive no closure with the deceased and might be distraught that their family chose to end their life so abruptly. In the sense of utilitarianism, voluntary euthanization does not make the most amount of people happy and can therefore be considered immoral. Euthanization, both voluntary and involuntary, turn seemingly innocent doctors into murderers. They are committing the act of harming a person whether if its their choice or not. In the sense of involuntary, they are not even giving their patient a choice and are taking away their voice and opinion from a very serious matter. They, as well as the family, are deciding the fate and ignoring all morals. In addition, with modern medicines, doctors have the ability to choose whether their patient lives or dies. In fact, according to the American Medical Association, the Code of Ethics that all licensed doctors must follow states, Euthanasia is fundamentally incompatible with the physicians role as a healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would be pose serious societal risks. It also states that doctors should ,not abandon a patient once it is determined that a cure is impossible . Doctors are taking the life of weak people. They are putting ones life in their hands and choosing a path that would benefit no one. There is also the circumstances of complications and biases. Having involuntary euthanasia as an option, doctors can persuade family members that the patient is only suffering or tell them that they are only wasting resources that can be used for people who arent as fatal and have a better chance of living and recovering. For voluntary euthanasia, some doctors might feel like they do not want to follow through with the euthanization because of moral or religious standpoints. It can cause rifts in hospitals and can cause many to quit their jobs as doctors because they do not agree with the subject and killing innocent people. The dilemma of euthanasia causes many problems and does not really solve any. It simple creates an easy way out. One might argue that if a person is in a lot of pain, they should not have to suffer the symptoms. And although I agree, euthanasia should not be considered as an alternative. There are many different medications that can treat the pain even if the damage done to the body is not curable. For people who are in comas who would typically partake in involuntary euthanasia, there are options such as life support. For people who have cancer or other terminal illnesses, there are procedures and medication that may be taken that can ease the pain until the end. People deserve to live until their time has ended naturally. Both voluntary and involuntary euthanization have created a problem in the morals of society. The debate over whether or not they should be legalized in all states in the United States of America has been disputed over for many years. Despite that it may or may no be legalized in the future, it will always be seen as immoral. The process of euthanasia is one that is in peaceful yet gruesome. It is not simply putting someone to sleep. I believe that euthanization holds a deeper meaning. I believe it is the death of a person. I believe that euthanasia is immoral because it the murdering of an innocent person. Doctors and family member are becoming murderers and I do not believe that it is fair. Although I do not want anyone to suffer tremendously, I do not see euthanasia being a solution to problems. I only see it becoming a bigger problem than the dilemma it is attempting to fix. In conclusion. There are many different types of euthanasia and the ones previously stated are only two of the multiple processes. If it cause so many dilemmas, is it really moral? Euthanasia has many definitions, but it should always be known as murder.